Stephen Harper castigated in a New York Times editorial

September 22, 2013

This is too good not to pass along (with proper references to its source).

Rod

I’d be remiss if I didn’t credit Canada.com journalist Michael Woods with the idea to track down the NYT article. http://o.canada.com/2013/09/22/new-york-times-criticizes-harper-governments-alleged-muzzling-of-scientists/

———————————————————————-

The New York Times Sunday Review

Editorial | Notebook

Silencing Scientists

By: Verlyn Klinkenborg

Published: September 21, 2013

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/22/opinion/sunday/silencing-scientists.html?_r=0

Over the last few years, the government of Canada — led by Stephen Harper — has made it harder and harder for publicly financed scientists to communicate with the public and with other scientists.

It began badly enough in 2008 when scientists working for Environment Canada, the federal agency, were told to refer all queries to departmental communications officers. Now the government is doing all it can to monitor and restrict the flow of scientific information, especially concerning research into climate change, fisheries and anything to do with the Alberta tar sands — source of the diluted bitumen that would flow through the controversial Keystone XL pipeline. Journalists find themselves unable to reach government scientists; the scientists themselves have organized public protests.

There was trouble of this kind here in the George W. Bush years, when scientists were asked to toe the party line on climate policy and endangered species. But nothing came close to what is being done in Canada.

Science is the gathering of hypotheses and the endless testing of them. It involves checking and double-checking, self-criticism and a willingness to overturn even fundamental assumptions if they prove to be wrong. But none of this can happen without open communication among scientists. This is more than an attack on academic freedom. It is an attempt to guarantee public ignorance.

It is also designed to make sure that nothing gets in the way of the northern resource rush — the feverish effort to mine the earth and the ocean with little regard for environmental consequences. The Harper policy seems designed to make sure that the tar sands project proceeds quietly, with no surprises, no bad news, no alarms from government scientists. To all the other kinds of pollution the tar sands will yield, we must now add another: the degradation of vital streams of research and information.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Stephen Harper castigated in a New York Times editorial”

  1. Tony Says:

    They’re OIL SANDS, not Tar sands !!!!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: